human dermal fibroblasts df-f (ZenBio)
Structured Review
Human Dermal Fibroblasts Df F, supplied by ZenBio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+dermal+fibroblasts+df-f/human+adult+dermal+fibroblasts/pm39358943-443-0-3
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
Related Articles
Cell Culture:Article Title: Rapid Assessment of Biomarkers on Single Extracellular Vesicles Using "Catch and Display" on Ultrathin Nanoporous Silicon Nitride Membranes. Article Snippet: Human MSCs (ATCC, Cat. # PCS-500-012) were cultured using MSC basal media with 10% exosome-depleted FBS (Bio-Techne, Cat. # S11150; supernatant collected after centrifuging at 100 000 g for 18 h) and 1% Antibiotic-Antimycotic (100X) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. # 15-240- 062). .. Modification:Article Title: Rapid Assessment of Biomarkers on Single Extracellular Vesicles Using "Catch and Display" on Ultrathin Nanoporous Silicon Nitride Membranes. Article Snippet: Human MSCs (ATCC, Cat. # PCS-500-012) were cultured using MSC basal media with 10% exosome-depleted FBS (Bio-Techne, Cat. # S11150; supernatant collected after centrifuging at 100 000 g for 18 h) and 1% Antibiotic-Antimycotic (100X) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. # 15-240- 062). .. other:Article Title: Loss of Sirtuin 1 Alters the Secretome of Breast Cancer Cells by Impairing Lysosomal Integrity Article Snippet: |
![(A-F) Representative regions of interest (ROI = 51 pm x 51 pm) in confocal microscope images taken following purified EV capture. EVs were collected from the conditioned cell culture media of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and <t>fibroblasts</t> via ultracentrifugation and were evaluated using an antibody targeting CD9 and an appropriate isotype control (mouse [Ms] IgG). EVs were characterized with nanoparticle tracking analysis, labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) then antibodies, prefiltered with SepCon™ spin cups (0.5 pm pores), and diluted to prepare an input of 10 5 EVs. (A), (B), and (C) correspond with the CFSE signal, CD9 antibody signal, and merged signals (CFSE & CD9) fora representative MSC EV sample, respectively. (D), (E), and (F) correspond with the CFSE signal, CD9 antibody signal, and merged signals (CFSE & CD9) for a representative fibroblast EV sample, respectively. Arrows in (C) and (F) indicate instances of colocalization and detection of CD9+ EVs. Scale bars = 5 pm. (G) Detection summary for CD9 and isotype control in terms of % positive EVs for MSC and fibroblast samples. (H) CD9 detection summary for MSC and fibroblast EVs following isotype control correction. (I) Corresponding Western blot (WB) bulk assay comparison for CD9 expression in MSC and fibroblast EV samples. (J) Comparison of CD9 fold increase (MSC/fibroblast) as reported by CAD-LB and WB assays. All captured EVs were imaged with a fluorescence microscope and quantification and colocalization analyses were completed using an open-source FIJI plugin (ComDet v.0.5.5). All bars represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, by Student’s t-test.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_00/10__1101_slash_2024__04__29__589900/10__1101_slash_2024__04__29__589900___F6.large.jpg)

